However if you are easily offput by production values and a budget feel - you will have already stopped playing this game. In the end it's a role playing game - and taken as that, the clumsiness can be forgiven with persistence from the player. What the game truly want's to be is a little hidden.
You have the action fans come in and instantly judge it for what they expect it to be. However in this climate of action-rpg melding, xp systems in action games, etc. In a pre-mass effect world, people would be more forgiving. The movement feels akward, the animation feels akward, the action feels arkward. However unlike new vegas, it feels like a budget game. What it does with decision making, rpg systems, and genre mixing is engaging and bold. Alpha protocol has it's own breed of ambition. However it's complicated and ambitious, it has detail and quirk. And yes, it crashes and glitches and breaks. However let's look at FNV for a moment, it's my favorite fallout game. However it's complicated and ambitious, it Obsidian seem to do better when they fail at ambition (Fallout new vegas, Alpha protocol, Kotor 2, and many others) rather than succeed at a polished safe game (dungeon siege 3 comes to mind).
Obsidian seem to do better when they fail at ambition (Fallout new vegas, Alpha protocol, Kotor 2, and many others) rather than succeed at a polished safe game (dungeon siege 3 comes to mind).
0 kommentar(er)
